{"id":5436,"date":"2026-05-14T02:36:35","date_gmt":"2026-05-14T02:36:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/knowledge-center\/psm4-vs-cwdm4-which-optical-transceiver-for-your-network\/"},"modified":"2026-05-25T09:11:30","modified_gmt":"2026-05-25T09:11:30","slug":"psm4-vs-cwdm4-which-optical-transceiver-for-your-network","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/ru\/knowledge-center\/psm4-vs-cwdm4-which-optical-transceiver-for-your-network","title":{"rendered":"PSM4 vs.\u00a0CWDM4 Which Optical Transceiver Is Right for Your Network"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-large\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1200\" height=\"712\" src=\"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/c590557b74394246abab9a05766937b9.webp\" alt=\"100G PSM4 VS CWDM4\" class=\"wp-image-5432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/c590557b74394246abab9a05766937b9.webp 1200w, https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/c590557b74394246abab9a05766937b9-300x178.webp 300w, https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/c590557b74394246abab9a05766937b9-1024x608.webp 1024w, https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/c590557b74394246abab9a05766937b9-768x456.webp 768w, https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/c590557b74394246abab9a05766937b9-18x12.webp 18w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Demand for 100G connectivity in data centers and enterprise networks is exploding. Choosing the right <strong>optical transceiver<\/strong> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.l-p.com\/store-27045-100g-qsfp28-sfp-dd.htm\"><strong>(100G QSFP28)<\/strong><\/a> is critical for performance, cost, scalability, and power efficiency. Two dominant <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/resources.l-p.com\/knowledge-center\/multi-source-agreements-optical-transceivers\"><strong>MSA<\/strong><\/a> (Multi-Source Agreement) standards emerged: <strong>PSM4 (Parallel Single Mode fiber 4 lane)<\/strong> and <strong>CWDM4 (Coarse Wavelength Division Multiplexing 4 lane)<\/strong>. While both achieve 100G over 2km using single-mode fiber <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/resources.l-p.com\/knowledge-center\/what-is-single-mode-fiber-and-how-does-it-work\"><strong>(SMF)<\/strong><\/a>, their underlying technologies and ideal use cases differ significantly. Understanding these 100G transceiver differences is key to optimizing data center networks and reducing optical interconnect costs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" ><strong>&#x1f527; PSM4: Parallelism Power<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1200\" height=\"618\" src=\"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d5d0ec3e0f5746b0baf77854ce154dda.webp\" alt=\"100G PSM4\" class=\"wp-image-5433\" srcset=\"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d5d0ec3e0f5746b0baf77854ce154dda.webp 1200w, https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d5d0ec3e0f5746b0baf77854ce154dda-300x155.webp 300w, https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d5d0ec3e0f5746b0baf77854ce154dda-1024x527.webp 1024w, https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d5d0ec3e0f5746b0baf77854ce154dda-768x396.webp 768w, https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/d5d0ec3e0f5746b0baf77854ce154dda-18x9.webp 18w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">PSM4 (IEEE 802.3bm) takes a straightforward parallel approach:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>Technology:<\/strong> Uses 4 independent optical lanes (each at <em>1310nm wavelength<\/em>).<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>Fiber:<\/strong> Requires <strong>8 fibers<\/strong> (4 Tx, 4 Rx) \u2013 typically in an MPO-12 connector.<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>Operation:<\/strong> Each lane transmits 25Gbps data simultaneously over its dedicated fiber pair.<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>Strengths:<\/strong> Simpler optical design potentially leading to lower component costs, excellent signal isolation.<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>Weaknesses:<\/strong> Higher fiber count consumption, larger cable bulk.<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>Ideal For:<\/strong> Ultra-short reach (\u2264 500m) within racks or rows, high-density direct attach scenarios where fiber count isn&#8217;t a primary constraint. A reliable <strong>PSM4 optical module<\/strong> like the <strong>LINK-PP LQ-M31100-DR4C<\/strong> delivers consistent performance for these demanding <strong>parallel optics applications<\/strong>.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" ><strong>&#x1f308; CWDM4: Wavelength Wizardry<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1200\" height=\"712\" src=\"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/74256b059b3d45df852aeb13cbeb7f4b.webp\" alt=\"100G CWDM4\" class=\"wp-image-5434\" srcset=\"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/74256b059b3d45df852aeb13cbeb7f4b.webp 1200w, https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/74256b059b3d45df852aeb13cbeb7f4b-300x178.webp 300w, https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/74256b059b3d45df852aeb13cbeb7f4b-1024x608.webp 1024w, https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/74256b059b3d45df852aeb13cbeb7f4b-768x456.webp 768w, https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/74256b059b3d45df852aeb13cbeb7f4b-18x12.webp 18w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">CWDM4 (MSA Specification) leverages optical multiplexing to conserve fiber:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>Technology:<\/strong> Uses 4 different CWDM wavelengths (~1271nm, 1291nm, 1311nm, 1331nm) multiplexed onto a <em>single<\/em> fiber pair.<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>Fiber:<\/strong> Requires only <strong>2 fibers<\/strong> (1 Tx, 1 Rx) \u2013 typically LC duplex.<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>Operation:<\/strong> A multiplexer (Mux) combines the 4 wavelengths onto the Tx fiber; a demultiplexer (Demux) separates them on the Rx end.<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>Strengths:<\/strong> Drastically reduces fiber count (4x less than PSM4), smaller cables, easier cable management, standard LC connectors.<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>Weaknesses:<\/strong> Requires more complex (and potentially costlier) lasers and Mux\/Demux components.<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>Ideal For:<\/strong> The <strong>sweet spot for most 2km 100G links<\/strong> (e.g., intra-data center interconnect, campus links). It&#8217;s the go-to solution for <strong>CWDM4 fiber efficiency <\/strong> and <strong>cost-effective 100G connectivity<\/strong>. The <strong>LINK-PP <\/strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.l-p.com\/products\/472577.htm\"><strong>LQ-CW100-FR4C<\/strong><\/a> is engineered for maximum reliability in these wavelength multiplexed networks.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" ><strong>&#x1f94a; Head-to-Head: PSM4 vs. CWDM4 &#8211; The Key Differences<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\">\n<table class=\"has-fixed-layout\">\n<colgroup><col style=\"min-width: 25px;\"\/><col style=\"min-width: 25px;\"\/><col style=\"min-width: 25px;\"\/><col style=\"min-width: 25px;\"\/><\/colgroup><tbody><tr><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>Feature<\/strong><\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>PSM4 (100G-PSM4)<\/strong><\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>CWDM4 (100G-CWDM4)<\/strong><\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>Winner for&#8230;<\/strong><\/p><\/th><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>Technology<\/strong><\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>4x Parallel 1310nm Lanes<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>4x WDM (1271\/1291\/1311\/1331nm)<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Simplicity (PSM4) \/ Fiber Eff. (CWDM4)<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>Fiber Count<\/strong><\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>8 Fibers<\/strong> (MPO-12)<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>2 Fibers<\/strong> (LC Duplex)<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>CWDM4<\/strong> (Significant Savings)<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>Reach<\/strong><\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Up to 500m (Optimal), 2km<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Up to 2km (Standard)<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Tie (Both do 2km, PSM4 better \u2264500m)<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>Connector<\/strong><\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>MPO-12\/APC<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>LC Duplex<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>CWDM4<\/strong> (Standard, Easier Mgmt)<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>Laser Complexity<\/strong><\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Simpler (4x same \u03bb)<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>More Complex (4x Diff \u03bb, Mux\/Demux)<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>PSM4<\/strong> (Potentially Lower Cost)<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>Cable Bulk<\/strong><\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Higher (Thicker cable)<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Lower (Thinner cable)<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>CWDM4<\/strong><\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>Primary Use Case<\/strong><\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Short Reach, High Density<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Standard 2km ICI, DCI<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Depends on Distance\/Fiber Needs<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>Cost Factor (Components)<\/strong><\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Potentially Lower Laser<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Potentially Higher Laser + Mux\/Demux<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Context Dependent<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>Cost Factor (Infra)<\/strong><\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Higher (More Fiber\/Cabling)<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>Lower<\/strong> (Less Fiber\/Cabling)<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p><strong>CWDM4<\/strong> (Overall Infra Cost)<\/p><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" ><strong>&#x1f3c6; Choosing Your Champion: PSM4 or CWDM4?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p style=\"margin: 0px 0px 4px;\"><strong>Choose PSM4 If:<\/strong><\/p><ul><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\">Your links are <strong>very short (\u2264 500m)<\/strong>.<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>Fiber infrastructure is abundant and cheap<\/strong>, and cable bulk isn&#8217;t a major issue.<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\">You prioritize potential <strong>component cost savings<\/strong> over fiber efficiency <em>for specific short-reach deployments<\/em>.<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\">You need <strong>high-density parallel optics<\/strong> within a confined space.<\/p><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px 0px 4px;\"><strong>Choose CWDM4 If (The Most Common Choice):<\/strong><\/p><ul><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\">Your links are <strong>up to 2km<\/strong>.<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>Fiber conservation is critical<\/strong> (saves significant cost and complexity).<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>Easier cable management<\/strong> with LC duplex is preferred.<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\">You need a <strong>standard, widely interoperable solution<\/strong> for data center interconnects (DCI) or enterprise backbone links.<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>Overall infrastructure cost<\/strong> (fiber + cabling + management) is a key driver.<\/p><\/li><\/ul><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&#x1f4a1; LINK-PP Solutions: Engineered for Performance &amp; Value<\/strong><br\/>Whether your 100G network design calls for the parallel efficiency of <strong>PSM4<\/strong> or the wavelength-multiplexing prowess of <strong>CWDM4<\/strong>,<a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.link-pp.com\/\"><strong> LINK-PP<\/strong><\/a> delivers high-performance, MSA-compliant solutions:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>For Demanding Short-Reach Parallelism:<\/strong> The <strong>LINK-PP PSM4 transceivers<\/strong> offers robust performance for cost-sensitive 100G optics in dense, short-distance applications.<\/p><\/li><li><p style=\"margin: 0px;\"><strong>For Efficient 2km Interconnect:<\/strong> <strong>LINK-PP<\/strong> provides reliable, low-power consumption <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.l-p.com\/products\/472577.htm\"><strong>100G<\/strong> <strong>CWDM4 transceivers<\/strong><\/a> optimized for scalable data center solutions and high-bandwidth enterprise networks.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Both modules undergo rigorous <strong>optical transceiver testing<\/strong> to ensure compatibility, low <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/resources.l-p.com\/glossary\/understanding-what-is-bit-error-rate\"><strong>bit error rate (BER)<\/strong><\/a>, and longevity, giving you confidence in your optical network infrastructure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" ><strong>&#x2705; Conclusion: Optimizing Your Optical Edge<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Understanding the <strong>differences between PSM4 and CWDM4<\/strong> is fundamental for making informed <strong>100G transceiver selection<\/strong>. While PSM4 offers simplicity for ultra-short parallel runs, <strong>CWDM4 has become the dominant standard for 2km 100G links due to its superior fiber efficiency, easier management, and lower overall infrastructure costs.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Ready to optimize your 100G deployment with the right optical solution? &#x1f517;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>&#x1f449; Explore LINK-PP&#8217;s full range of high-performance, reliable 100G QSFP28 modules, including our industry-leading CWDM4 transceivers and PSM4 transceivers, designed to deliver maximum value and uptime for your critical links. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.l-p.com\/store-27045-100g-qsfp28-sfp-dd.htm\"><strong>Visit our product page \u279e<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" ><strong>&#x1f4dd; FAQ<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" >What is the main difference between PSM4 and CWDM4?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">PSM4 needs eight fibers and uses MPO\/MTP connectors. It sends data in parallel. CWDM4 only needs two fibers and uses LC duplex connectors. It sends data using different wavelengths.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>PSM4 is good for short links. CWDM4 is better for longer distances.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" >Which transceiver is easier to install in existing networks?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">CWDM4 is usually easier to put in. Most networks already use LC connectors and two-fiber cables.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>PSM4 might need new parallel fiber if you do not have it.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" >Which option is more cost-effective for short distances?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">PSM4 often costs less for short links if you already have parallel fiber.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>CWDM4 can save money on cables for new or bigger networks.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" >Can both PSM4 and CWDM4 support future network upgrades?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">CWDM4 is better for upgrades. It uses fewer fibers, so adding more is easy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>PSM4 might need more space as your network gets bigger.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" >Which transceiver should a data center choose for long links?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A data center should pick CWDM4 for links up to 2 kilometers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>PSM4 is best for short links inside a building.<\/p><\/blockquote>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Compare PSM4 vs. CWDM4 to choose the right 100G optical transceiver for your network based on distance, cabling, cost, and upgrade needs.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5435,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[13],"class_list":["post-5436","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-knowledge-center","tag-100g-modules"],"blocksy_meta":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5436","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5436"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5436\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7566,"href":"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5436\/revisions\/7566"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5435"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5436"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5436"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lp.szlogic.cn\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}